Property Section Information
General
The contents of the property section of a title sheet are determined:
in accordance with section 6 of the 2012 Act, and
in terms of regulation 12, the Land Register Rules etc. (Scotland) Regulations 2014 (the Land Register Rules).
Order of notes
The LRS sets the order of information which supplements the description, e.g. details of a shared plot would appear before a schedule of separate tenements, which itself would be before a schedule of rights to enforce real burdens.
Any additional general notes should appear in the property section in the following order:
Notes defining the extent of the property.
Notes relating to minerals.
Notes relating to boundaries.
Notes which will not be permanent or potentially will change (e.g. a caveat)
RB1 Note
Note: The description of the burdened property in each entry of the Schedule of Particulars relative to Subsisting Rights to Real Burdens above should be read in conjunction with the Explanatory Note in the Burdens Section.
This note is included in the picklist of property section notes as RB1 and should be placed after any notes defining the extent of the property but before any minerals note.
Description of Property in Deed
An application to register a property that is not yet in the land register must include a sufficient description of the subjects to enable the plot of ground in question to be depicted on the cadastral map. For property that is already in the land register, the description of the subjects must contain a reference to the title number of the subjects.
A summary of the requirements for descriptions in deeds for different application types is set out below.
Prior to the introduction of the Land Register, there was no requirement for title deeds that were recorded in the Register of Sasines to include an accurate plan of the property. Instead, the requirement was that to record a deed it must contain a sufficient description of the property. Such descriptions are varied and can include plans drawn by professional surveyors, plans drawn by non-professionals, plans based on historic maps, boundary descriptions based on physical features, descriptions based on field numbers, descriptions based on vague descriptions, or a combination of these. As the quality of the description or plan in these prior Sasine deeds is not always suitable for registration purposes, sometimes it is necessary for a new deed plan to be produced to clarify the historical descriptions contained in the prior deeds. Such new deed plans should be attached to the DIR in the application and are not acceptable as standalone "certified plans". See Description of Property Must Be Acceptable for details of the guidance given to plans officers on the standard of description required to allow the Keeper to accurately represent a property on the cadastral map.
There are additional requirements for deeds relating to plots of land that wholly comprise seabed. When submitted as part of an FR application, the deed must contain a description of the plot of land based on OSGB36 coordinates, as well as a location plan in relation to the coast of Scotland - see Description of Seabed Plot Must Be Acceptable for more details.
Descriptions under exception
It is not uncommon to encounter conveyances which describe the subjects being sold as a larger property under exception of parts that have been sold. This style of description is often used, rather than including a positive description of the remaining subjects in the DIR, because it ensures that the seller is not inadvertently left with the responsibility for any part of the original subjects which may have been overlooked.
How the property is mapped and the description in the property section will depend on whether the property is part of a tenement or not as per the guidance below:
Rights and Pertinents in the Property Section
These are additions to the property which add to its amenity or are necessary for its proper enjoyment.
Detached properties will normally include these areas exclusively; flatted or adjoining properties may share the right to these areas with other properties. Examples of the different styles of description used are given below.
Pertinents and rights are normally, but not exclusively, found in the breakaway deed (i.e. the deed in which the subjects are first dealt with as an individual entity). A pertinent such as a servitude right of access might also be found in a deed of servitude.
Pertinents in this context could also include rights to enforce real burdens created in deeds constituted on and after the appointed day under the Title Conditions (Scotland) Act. Guidance and general information on entering rights of enforcement in a title sheet can be found at Title Conditions Act .
Land held under exclusive ownership should already be included in the property section by plans, for example:
"with the garden ground tinted pink on the cadastral map".
Editing pertinents and rights
Text from the deed in which the rights are created is extracted and added to the property section, and the text should make sense within the four corners of the title sheet. Consequently, it may be necessary to alter the text.
For example, if a deed states that subjects are sold with:
“a right of access to the subjects from the remainder of said subjects belonging to me”,
this would not make sense in the context of the property section as it would not be clear who "me" was or which subjects belonged to "me". This information will be identifiable from elsewhere in the deed and the text therefore must be altered so that it makes sense in the property section - as shown below:
“a right of access to the subjects in this Title from the subjects adjoining on the west”
The following phrases or words are commonly found in deeds and would not make sense without amendment:
In the examples below text to be included in the rights entry is in bold text and text that may require clarification/amendment is in italics.
Handwritten Deeds
Where a handwritten deed contains rights to be included in the property section of the title sheet but does not contain burdens, the deed should be incorporated by reference into the title sheet. The property section description should read 'Together with the rights contained in the (Deed type) in note x after mentioned'.
A note should be added to the Property Section in the following terms:
'The said rights were created in [Deed type] by [A to B], recorded G.R.S (County) [dd mmm yyyy] which is incorporated into this title sheet in terms of section 10(3)(b) of the Land Registration etc. (Scotland) Act 2012.'
Cross referencing between property and burdens sections
In the majority of cases, both rights and burdens for a property can be clearly and readily identified by the registration officer from the deeds submitted with the application. Some deeds, however, contain rights and burdens that are so closely inter-related that to try to separate the rights from the burdens would seriously jeopardise the interpretation of the deed.
The cross-referral method for entering rights of ownership in the property section can also be used for servitudes where the deed containing the servitude contains intermingled conditions linked to the use of the servitude (e.g. a condition that the proprietor of the subjects being registered must repair any damage caused to the property over which the servitude right of access operates).
Servitudes explains the property section entry more fully, including examples of different scenarios.
There are special arrangements for servitudes that are declared in an application form to be prescriptive servitudes.
If a common area is described in the deed of conditions but is unmappable and the descriptive deed (whether the breakaway/split off or a deed of conditions) was recorded or registered prior to 8 Dec 2014, the legal officer should follow the guidance at Unmappable Common Areas below. This is notwithstanding previous policy on PMP Plus Limited v the Keeper, inter alia whether or not the development was begun prior to 3 August 2009.
Under no circumstances should a cross-reference for rights be made to another title sheet.
Restrictive notes
Restrictive notes should rarely be used as plans will normally be able to provide a positive description using tints. However, there may be instances in complex titles where it is easier to qualify what is included in the title by way of a note rather than providing multiple references to create a positive description. For example, if there are floor level encroachments between adjoining properties the whole building may be edged red, but the restriction on ownership could be explained by a note:
Note: As regards the part tinted blue on the cadastral map, only the basement and a right in common with the proprietor of xyz is included in this title.
Rights and their Counterpart Encumbrances
Theoretically, no right of servitude, or right to enforce real burdens, can safely be ‘guaranteed’ unless checks are carried out to ascertain whether the original constitutive deed was appropriate and was granted by a person with title, and that the appropriate registration occurred. However, the time and expense involved in following such a counsel of perfection would be entirely unacceptable, as would extensive limitation or exclusion of warranty in respect of such rights. A more practical view must therefore be taken.
Any applications where a right of ownership in pipes or cables is included and it appears that the pipes and cables run through land owned by another party should be referred in the first instance to a legal senior caseworker.
What 'Rights' should be Omitted from the Title Sheet
Where a right is a right of common ownership and the area owned in common cannot be mapped, the guidance at Unmappable Common Areas below is relevant if the descriptive deed was recorded or registered pre 8 Dec 2014.
The other rights to be omitted are:
vague, or non-specific rights;
'rights of use' which cannot fall within the definition of a servitude;
rights which cannot fall within the definition of a servitude because no type of servitude (for example, a right of access) is identified.
Rights granted in DIR but not conveyed in breakaway/foundation writ
Where a right appears in a deed inducing registration that was not conveyed in the foundation deed, and has not been formally granted since, it should not be included in the title sheet, where this is apparent on examination of the application as submitted. An example might be a servitude right of pedestrian access that appeared in the foundation writ, which is changed to a vehicular right in the DIR, with nothing in the prescriptive progress of titles to support its change and where the application has not met the Keeper's policy in relation to Prescriptive Servitudes under Servitudes. Even where documentation such as affidavit evidence is produced to the Keeper, it should not be included in the title sheet. See otherwise Servitudes with regard to servitude rights.
Rights of Use
The phrase ‘right of use’ alone is not capable of being a servitude or incorporeal pertinent in its own right. However, in some cases the wording ‘right of use’ in a deed may be associated with additional text that might be sufficient to create a servitude.
Registration guidance is set out below:
A right of use should only appear on a title sheet where it is a servitude. Typically a bald statement as to right of use (for no specific purpose) will not be capable of being a servitude.
However in many cases the wording ‘right of use’ together with other factors (like the thing in which the right exists) will be sufficient to create a servitude. For example - a right to use an access roadway would typically be taken to create a servitude of access.
The distinctions are very fine and, unless instructed by the applicant, registration officers should include rights of use in the title sheet on the basis they are servitudes provided that they fulfil the general rules for the registration of servitudes, e.g. dual registration where appropriate.
Unmappable Common Areas
A key requirement for registration in the Land Register is that applications for registration must provide a satisfactory description of the plot of land to be registered in order to allow the Keeper to accurately represent it on the cadastral map. Section 16 of the 2012 Act provides an exception to this rule when it comes to registering flats within tenements or flatted buildings, but only in so far as the extent of the individual flatted properties, pertinents and rights fall within the tenement steading cadastral unit.
This section explains a further policy exception to the general rule. This applies in limited circumstances to common areas that cannot be mapped on the cadastral map due to the lack of a mappable description in the titles, where the deed in which the common area is described was recorded or registered prior to 8 December 2014.
Role of the plans officer
The plans officer will, as normal, identify if the common area can or cannot be mapped. If it cannot and the application falls within the Keeper's policy as expressed above, then they will add a note to the LRS to highlight that the area cannot be mapped on the cadastral map under this policy exception.
The plans officer will also add a note requesting that the legal settler sends the pro forma letter to the submitting agent upon completion of the registration.
Guidance for plans staff is available at Common Areas - When to Include, Omit or Reject?.
Guidance for legal officers
Instructions for legal officers depend upon whether the right is contained in a simple standalone deed or if it is part of a complex deed containing intermingled rights and burdens, as set out below:
Identification of Common Areas Dependent on a Future Uncertain Event - PMP Plus Ltd v Keeper of the Registers of Scotland
This situation occurs where a developer purports to convey (but in property law terms, does not actually convey) to the purchasers of individual house plots, a right or rights of common property where the identification of the open areas cannot be determined until a future uncertain event has occurred (e.g. whatever open areas remain after the development is completed). In those instances, the 'description' of the areas could either be in the split-off/ breakaway disposition or by reference to a deed of conditions in terms similar to the following examples:
In the case of PMP Plus Ltd v the Keeper of the Registers of Scotland, the Lands Tribunal for Scotland determined that it is not possible to create rights in such common areas where the identification of those areas is dependent on a future uncertain event. Further, where a disposition or title sheet contains such wording, the wording is meaningless and ineffective such that no rights of ownership are created on registration. As a result of the later case of Lundin Homes Limited v the Keeper of the Registers of Scotland, it is clear that the occurrence of the future event referred to in the descriptive deed is not sufficient in itself to create the rights in common at a subsequent date following registration of the plots and the purported rights in the land register.
Applications submitted on and after 8 December 2014, in so far as they purport to seek registration of a right of common ownership, must contain sufficient information to allow for mapping of the area(s) to be held in common ownership on the cadastral map. If an application does not meet this condition of registration then such application must be rejected, subject to the exceptions for (1) common areas lying within tenement steadings and (2) applications where the description of the common area is founded on a deed recorded or registered prior to 8 December 2014, where the rights in common (if any) will be omitted from the title sheet of the plot in question (this applies to new FR applications to register an unregistered plot of land or TP applications to transfer part of a registered plot). For the avoidance of doubt, previous policy arrangements whereby such 'rights' would continue to be entered on title sheets where the development in question had begun prior to 3 August 2009 do not apply.
Mineral Reservations in the Property Section
Unless the terms of a particular title state otherwise, by virtue of the principle a coelo usque ad centrum (from the sky to the centre of the earth) the owner of the land owns the minerals beneath the surface. However minerals are legally capable of being owned as a separate tenement if they are severed from the surface land.
Guidance and information designed to help plans and legal officers settling minerals titles is available at Mapping Minerals Titles and Mineral Titles.
As a result of a historic agreement between RoS and Scottish Government, some Transport Scotland titles require a customised minerals reservation. Transport Scotland will usually instruct us to include the customised note - see example letter . Please use this version of the note exactly as requested. Refer to a Senior Adviser if the style of the note differs from the style in this letter.
Minerals can be constituted as a separate tenement by express grant or by reservation in a conveyance of the land and the separation of the interest in minerals is effectively an exception from a plot of land being registered.
The terms of a minerals reservation clause may not only except the minerals but also create burdens on the minerals title which are rights in favour of the owners of the surface plot of land. For example, restrictions on how the minerals are worked, compensation for damage to the surface, obligations of support etc. are rights which pertain to the owner of the surface plot of land. Conversely, the minerals reservation clause may also create burdens on the surface plot of land which are rights in favour of the minerals owner: for example, rights to sink shafts, erect pit head gear, etc. For practical purposes therefore, only a brief reference to the minerals reservation is made in the property section and the full text of the minerals reservation clause is set out in the burdens section. The mineral reservation note can be adapted to suit different circumstances and the examples below offer guidance for the most commonly encountered scenarios.