Insolvency - Personal and Corporate

Insolvency - Personal and Corporate

General

In terms of sections 10(2)(c) and 32(2) of the 2012 Act, where the validity of a registrable deed to which an application relates might be affected by an entry in the Register of Inhibitions (ROI), the Keeper must enter a reference to the entry in the ROI in the relevant title sheet. However, the statutory duty is to disclose an entry in the ROI on a title sheet in the Land Register only when the inhibited person has granted a deed which appears to be in breach of an entry in the ROI.

The note containing the particulars of the ROI entry is made in the proprietorship section of the title sheet. No separate limitation or exclusion of the Keeper's warranty is required. 

 

What is the Register of inhibitions?

The Register of Inhibitions and Adjudications is defined in the Conveyancing (Scotland) Act 1924 as being for the registration of 'inhibitions, interdictions, adjudications, reductions and notices of litigiosity'. These are notifications that the owner of the property or holder of the right cannot competently grant future voluntary deeds alienating or encumbering that property or right. It is commonly known as the ‘personal register’ and legal professionals often refer to instructing a ‘personal search’ of the ROI.

The existence of an entry in the ROI affecting the granter or consenter to a deed does not necessarily prevent a transaction proceeding; rather the deed being registered is at risk of being reduced by court action raised at the instance of the inhibiting party. For example a disposition granted by an inhibited person is liable to being reduced at the instance of an inhibiting creditor. The deed is not ineffective at the time of registration, rather a decree of reduction renders it ineffective at the date of the decree. 

An entry in the ROI affects future voluntary transactions by the inhibited party over all properties owned by them so, for example, an entry would not affect a notice of payment of grant as this is not a voluntary deed. An inhibition or other entry in the ROI can affect many types of registrable deed. Typically, these will be registrable deeds which either alienate or encumber the inhibited debtor's property although transactions by the holder of a subordinate right to vary or discharge that right, such as a discharge of a standard security by an inhibited heritable creditor, may also be liable to reduction.

There are two ways in which an officer may become aware of a potential adverse entry in the ROI:

The application form contains questions designed to elicit information from the applicant as to whether they have obtained searches of the ROI and the outcome of such searches. 

The registration officer is required to consider whether to search the ROI and thereafter further investigate any apparently adverse entries.  The Keeper will not duplicate a search reported by the applicant's agent on the application form. The registration officer will only require to carry out a search for the 'gap' period subsequent to the date to which that search was certified as specified on the application form. If no search has been carried out, unless the deed is of a type where no search is required, a five year search will be carried out by the registration officer. If the granter/proprietor does not voluntarily alienate or grant a right in or over that property, then no ROI search is necessary as the validity of the registrable deed under consideration cannot be adversely affected by an entry in the ROI. 

When to search and who to search against

In general terms, a registration officer will carry out an ROI search against the granter of, and any consenter to, a registrable deed which is a voluntary act alienating or encumbering the granter's property. If the registrable deed is not a voluntary alienation (such as a transfer of title, grant of lease or assignation of lease) or a voluntary creation of an encumbrance (such as a standard security, servitude or burden) or a voluntary discharge of such a right, no ROI search is necessary against the proprietor (or any other party to the deed). This is because the transaction is not one which can breach an inhibition and so no search of the ROI is necessary. However, when undertaking a search in relation to a disposition being granted in exercise of power of sale, both the creditor exercising their right and the debtor should be searched (subject to guidance below on well known financial institutions).

The following parties must be searched against:

  1. Granter(s) of a deed of the type mentioned below unless the granter is of a type not searched against for risk reasons; and

  2. Consenters (except for Matrimonial Homes or Civil Partnership purposes - because a consenter for these purposes is not conveying a relevant property right);

Grantees do not require to be searched. For example, where only an application for registration of a disposition is presented and the grantee in a disposition is not themselves granting a standard security, then only the granter of the disposition requires to be searched, unless the registration officer is also examining a separate application for registration of a standard security or other deed granted by the grantee in the disposition. 

It is considered a ‘justifiable insurance risk’ (i.e. no real threat to the Keeper’s warranty) not to search against large, well-established public bodies and financial institutions. These include:

  1. Local Authorities;

  2. Government Departments/Ministers of State or Scottish Ministers;

  3. National Undertakings (such as Scottish Power, British Gas etc.);

  4. Well know financial institutions (such as Bank of Scotland, RBS, Nationwide, Santander etc.);

  5. Accountant in Bankruptcy.  

Unless the granter is major lender, local authority, government department, agency, Minister etc then the registration officer should search the granters when examining an application pertaining to one of the following registrable deeds:

Most common registrable deeds

Less common registrable deeds

Disposition

Agreement (Nature Conservancy)

Standard security

Assignation (or partial assignation) of lease/Assignation and variation of lease

Discharge of standard security

Assignation of Bond

Assignation of standard security

Conveyance in liferent

Deed of variation of standard security

Countryside Management Agreement

Deed of restriction of standard security

Deed of conditions/Deed of real burdens- separate benefited property or properties nominated at registration

Ranking Agreement

Deed of servitude

Assignation of lease

Deed of variation of servitude

Contract of Excambion

Deed of servitude, discharge

Grant of lease/ sub-lease

Deed of application/disapplication of development management scheme

 

Deed of variation of burdens

 

Discharge of bond/ex facie absolute disposition

 

Discharge of real burdens/servitude

 

Forestry dedication agreement

 

Good neighbour agreements

 

Minute of extension of lease

 

Renunciation of lease

 

Section 32 Agreement (Enterprise and New Towns (Scotland) Act 1990)

 

Section 75 planning agreements

 

Undertaking not to exercise pre-emption

 

Unilateral obligations (Section 75(1)(b) Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997

 

Variation of development management scheme

Do not search any person when examining applications for registration of any of the following registrable deed types. In most cases, this is because either (1) the registrable deeds are not voluntary acts of the proprietor of the subjects but are transactions undertaken by third parties or court orders, (2) a policy decision has been made not to search against the granter of the deed or (3) there is no recipient of a right which would be at risk of reduction.

Ancient monuments

Lands Tribunal Order

 

Certificate granted by private rented Housing Committee

Nature Conservation Order

 

Certificate of consignation

Notice of decision to vary or revoke a repairing standard enforcement order

 

Certificate of exclusion of monuments

Notice of cessor of improvement grant/repairs grant

 

Charging order- all types

Notice of revocation of maintenance plan

 

CPO

Notice of payment of grant/loan

 

Decree of adjudication in execution (for debt)

Notice of termination

 

Decree of adjudication in implement

Notice of title

 

Decree of foreclosure

Notice of potential liability for costs

 

Decree of irritancy

Notice of decision to vary/revoke RSEO

 

Decree of reduction of voidable deed

Notice of revocation of maintenance plan

 

Decree of rectification of defectively expressed deed

Receipt under Industrial and Provident Societies Act

 

Deed of Conditions/Deed of Real Burdens- no separate benefited property/ies at registration

Schedule conveyance/statutory conveyance or conveyance under s106 Title Conditions Act

 

Determinations under Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997

Stopping up order

 

Discharge of repayment order

Tree Preservation Order

 

Discharge of charging order

Maintenance order

 

Extract decree of foreclosure

Maintenance plan

 

Extract Decree of irritancy of lease

Management Agreement (National Parks)

 

GVD

 Voluntary registration application

 

Guardianship order or Intervention order under Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000

 

Search the granter of the Disposition, as an inhibition affecting the granter/seller might result in the Disposition being declared void.

Do not search against the grantee — any inhibition against them will not affect the validity of the Disposition.

Search (1) the granter of the Disposition and (2) the granter of the Standard Security (invariably the grantee in the Disposition).

In other words, search the ROI against both seller and purchaser. The search against the granter of the standard security is necessary because if he/she is inhibited then the standard security is voidable by the inhibiting creditor.

Search the granter of the Standard Security

Do not search the creditor in the standard security. An inhibition against the creditor does not affect the validity of a heritable Security (or other deed) being granted in their favour.

Do not search the proprietor of the subjects (usually this is the grantee in the discharge).

Do not search against the granter of a discharge who is a major lender or well-known public body etc. 

However, if the creditor is neither a major lender nor a public body, then they must be searched against.

No search is required. Do not search either the registered proprietor in the title sheet or the applicant in the application.

If the Granter/proprietor does not voluntarily alienate, no ROI search is necessary against the proprietor (or any other party to the deed) because the transaction is not one which is in breach of the inhibition.

Searching procedures - how to search correctly

This section concerns the best practice in searching the ROI using the LRS. In particular it considers how to search non-natural persons, such as companies but also types of individuals such as members of the nobility or foreign forms of personal name.

When an ROI search is run from the LRS, the search results are accessed via a link that can be found on the Intranet under "Quick Links" called "LRS ROI Search/Disclosure Results" . The results of your search can be found either by doing a "Title Number Search" which will display your results or you can select the relevant County and then click on the Submit button to display a list of results in title number order. Scroll down the list to find your title number and click on it to display the results "print" on your screen. Alternatively, if there are a large number of results you can use the "Edit" "Find on this page" functionality in your browser (Ctrl-F) and type in your title number to find your results in the list.

The system which searches the ROI via the LRS employs a searching strategy using names as ‘keys’. Names are not required to be formatted or normalised and usually it will only be necessary to import them as they appear on the screen. The system is designed to catch not only precise name matches but also common variations. All of the individual components of a name are searched e.g. Muhammed McKay is searched giving equal value to both ‘Muhammed’ and ‘McKay’. While, as a general principle, the ROI searching system has been set up to reveal common variations of names, the basic searching rules should be borne in mind when considering whether a name requires to be entered in more than one format to complete an exhaustive search.

Personal names are indexed under surname, and are linked to the entry in the register by a unique number. The numbers are allocated to each deed as it is registered and a minute made. An ROI search is likely to reveal entries similar to the following:

Bissett  

Alan 99/01234
Allan 99/05678

In the example above, Alan Bissett appeared in deed/minute number 01234 in the year 1999. If an inhibition is registered in the name of Mr and Mrs A Bissett an entry in the Register would be made under ‘Bissett A’ and ‘Bissett’. A search against Alan Bissett should return all entries under ‘Bissett’, together with variations in spelling (Alan/Allan).

In the case of women with two or more surnames, a check should be made to ensure that all the surnames are entered in the surname field: e.g. ‘Young or Sutton or Jones or Walker’ typed as one line.

Generally punctuation is ignored in the ROI search, i.e. full stops, commas, hyphens or apostrophes (as in ‘P.L.C.’ etc) should not be included.

An exception to this general rule applies to apostrophes which form an integral part of a name, such as ‘O’Brien’ or ‘M’Wada’, or ‘Jones’s Taxis’, ‘MCG’s’, where the omission of the apostrophe would create a different name.

Words such as ‘Mr’, ‘junior’, ‘of’, ‘as’ ‘The’ etc. are ignored.

Diminutives of names can cause problems when searching.

A person may be referred to in a deed as Liz or Bill but it may be that when the entry was made in the ROI the name was given in its full form of Elizabeth or William.

If a deed narrates a diminutive form of the party who is to be searched against, both forms of the name should be entered. However, if the deed gives the full name there is no need to search against possible diminutives. The current searching system should pick up common variations of names, but care should be exercised in such cases. 

The surname plus the prefixes are entered in the surname field

Surname

Forename

De La Rue

Frances

Le Mesurier

Charles

De Mello

Frank Antony

van den Bergh

Hendrick

Where the granter of a deed is an executor or trustee, they are not searched as individuals. They must be searched in their capacity as executor or trustee.

‘Executors of’ (‘Trustees of’, or ‘Mar Con Trustees of’) will be entered in the prefix field. 

Titles are entered in the forename field. Nobility should be under all their names/titles. ‘Edward Bruce Logan, Earl of Leith, Viscount Portobello, Baron of Seafield’ will be searched under all three names/titles, viz:

Surname: Logan
Forename: Edward Bruce

and

Surname: Leith
Forename: Earl of

and

Surname: Portobello
Forename: Viscount

and

Surname: Seafield 

Forename: Baron of

If the party to be searched against is narrated in the deed as ‘Muhammed McKay, trading as Muhammed McKay, Replacement Windows, at 5 Hill Street, Colinsburgh, Fife’, only Muhammed McKay as an individual is searched against i.e.

Surname: McKay
Forename: Muhammed

The additional information is merely a designation. However, if he is referred to in the deed as Muhammed McKay, partner of ‘Muhammed McKay’s Windows’ then the individual (as above) and the firm are both searched against i.e.

Surname: McKay's Windows (firm)
Forename: Muhammed
Prefix: partner of

The ‘Firm of Redwood’ is searched as Redwood, with ‘Firm of’ being entered in the prefix field. Firms which also include an individual’s name e.g. Firm of Margaret Smith are searched as ‘Smith (Firm)’ in the surname field. One-line entry firm names follow the deed and are entered in full in the surname field e.g.

Miss Tidy
Mister Clean

Firms which include individual names or initials often have more than one possibility for indexing and in these instances all possibilities should be searched, e.g. ‘Firm of T C Herriot and E F Jenkins’ should be searched as:

Surname: Herriot and E F Jenkins (Firm)
Forename: T C

and

Surname: Herriot and E F Jenkins
Forename: T C
Prefix: Firm of 

Companies are searched as they appear unless the first word of the name could be the forename of a person.

Meadowbank Homes Limited would be searched as a straight line entry under ‘Meadowbank Homes Limited’.

However, George Brown and Smith Limited would require to be searched under:

Surname: George Brown and Smith Limited

and

Surname: Brown and Smith Limited
Forename: George 

Review your results, following the guidance below at Which ROI disclosures can be ruled out and which should be considered for disclosure. If required, you can print out any relevant pages using the normal print functionality in your browser. If there are no matching entries, the disclosure result will simply state ‘No deed’.

If you are unable to eliminate all the name matches from the results, you need to enter the minute numbers in question in your ROI search in the LRS in order to disclose these outstanding entries. The disclosure print obtained from this will provide a full print of the ROI minute for each minute number entered. Following the guidance below you must then decide whether these minutes could constitute an adverse entry and so may require entry in the title sheet under section 32 of the 2012 Act.

Period of search 

The application form contains questions pertaining to entries in the ROI. The period that the registration officer must search will depend upon the answers given to the relevant questions in the application form. If the applicant has certified the date to which a search of the ROI has been carried out, (whether in part (i) or (ii) of the question on the application form), the registration officer will use that date in fixing the period during which the ROI is searched.

When to search the 'gap' period

Where for example the date of the application for registration is 23 January 2015, and the date to which the applicant has certified that a search has been carried out in the ROI is 6 January 2015, the period of search will be 6 January to 23 January 2015. Should the applicant disclose any adverse entries in the application form, the period of search will be five years back from 23 January 2015. Where there are attached applications, the registration officer must take account of all the dates to which an ROI search has been certified as having been carried out. Where the granters of each deed are different and in addition, the dates to which a search is certified are also different, the start date for the search should be the earliest date certified. However, if the respective granters of the deeds who require to be searched are one and the same (e.g. the same person grants two Standard Securities) the start date for the search will be the latest date certified. 

The disposition is by A to B and the standard security is granted by B.

A search will be carried out against both A and B.

If the dates to which an ROI is certified to have been carried out in the separate application forms are different, you should search back against both A and B to the earliest date certified.

The standard securities will be granted by the same person and only the granter will be searched against.

If each application form certifies that an ROI has been carried out to a different date, it is acceptable for the start date of the search to be the most recent of these dates.

When to do a five year search  

The registration officer should search for five years back from the date of application where there are:

Where the applicant-

  1. indicates that the deed to which the application relates is not capable of being affected by an entry in the ROI but the registrable deed is of a type against which the Keeper would normally carry out a search; or

  2. certifies that no search has been carried out; or 

  3. does not certify a date to which the search has been carried out,

then the registration officer must carry out a full five year search back from the date of application.

The application contains a deed which requires an ROI search to be carried out. The applicant has advised on the application form that the ROI search obtained by them or exhibited to them during the transaction has disclosed an adverse entry or entries.

A full five year search should be carried out to confirm whether the entries are adverse. This may also necessitate raising a requisition of the applicant's agent for further information as per the guidance at Which ROI disclosures can be ruled out and which should be considered for disclosure below. 

Any discrepancy between the search printout and the information provided by the agent should be referred to the Team Leader or senior caseworker as appropriate.

Which ROI disclosures can be ruled out and which should be considered for disclosure

Whether an inhibition in execution which is disclosed in the ROI search will strike at a particular transaction is governed by the rules determining the effective date of that transaction. An inhibition may only be eliminated prior to raising a requisition if it is clear that it cannot strike at the transaction in question, or if an advance notice protects the registrable deed in the circumstances. 

(1) Inexact matches e.g.

  • exact name, different address at a distance from any address provided for the granter(s)

  • exact name (common), present whereabouts unknown

  • similar name, different address.

(2) Discharge or recall registered in ROI for the inhibition or other ROI entry identified.

(3) Inhibition over 5 years old which has not been discharged.

(4) Notice which was not followed by Schedule within 21 days (unless registrable deed is being registered within the 21 day period) or subsequent entry in ROI was after date of application for registrable deed.

(5) Inhibition against seller recorded after missives signed: Seller no longer has power of disposal, so Inhibition does not affect. 

(6) Inhibition against purchaser recorded before date of delivery: Purchaser does not have power of disposal, so Inhibition does not affect. .

  • Exact name and address

  • Exact name and nearby address

  • Exact name if uncommon, present whereabouts unknown

  • Similar name, exact address

Disclose the hits by entering the relevant minutes in the ROI screen in the LRS and then viewing them in the LRS ROI search/disclosure results tab in Quick Links on the intranet homepage.

  • Outstanding letters of inhibition/summons of inhibition.

  • Any entry appearing less than 35 days prior to the application date whether or not there is an advance notice for the registrable deed, to obtain authorisation for entry of details of ROI entry in title sheet.

  • Any other entries e.g. certified notice of determination/mem of renewal/notice of abandonment.

For any registrable deed where the ROI entry is less than 35 days prior to the date of application in the Land Register, check for an advance notice.

Check for advance notice

If the registration officer identifies ROI entries which may require an entry in the title sheet, before raising a requisition of the applicant for them to provide confirmation of whether the entry affects, the registration officer must firstly consider:

(1) whether the inhibition or other ROI entry identified was registered within the 35 day period prior to the date of application for the deed under consideration and, if so;

(2) whether there is an advance notice either in the application record, in the archive record or recorded in the Sasine register protecting the deed under examination, that was recorded/noted before the date of the ROI entry.

(3) whether, if there is an advance notice, the registrable deed was also submitted for registration in its protected period. 

If it was, the ROI entry can be ruled out and does not require to be disclosed.

See also Advance Notices 

If there is no advance notice, where there is an ROI entry within 35 days of the date of application, a requisition to the agent will usually be raised to seek confirmation whether it affects the transaction. The application must be referred to a senior caseworker before the requisition is sent to authorise an entry in the title sheet if the agent does not reply with suitable evidence.

If there are other entries more than 35 days prior to the date of application which cannot be ruled out, a requisition to the applicant's agent will usually be made for confirmation as to whether it affects the transaction or not. The application must be referred to a senior caseworker before the requisition is sent to authorise an entry in the title sheet if the agent does not reply with suitable evidence. 

See below under Personal Insolvency for guidance on registration practice where a registrable deed is not protected by an advance notice and styles of adverse entry notes in relation to inhibitions and other adverse entries in the ROI.

If disclosures cannot be ruled out, a referral is made to a senior caseworker to confirm whether an entry may be required. Thereafter, a requisition must be sent to the submitting agent using an LR21 with a copy of the disclosure, and the application placed in standover. If no response is received within the 42 day period allocated for a case to be in standover, or the applicant's agent confirms that the disclosure strikes, an entry must be made in the title sheet as authorised by your referral officer.

If a disclosure is a notice of signeted summons in an action of reduction, refer the application to a senior caseworker.

Archiving

If an adverse entry in the ROI is disclosed in the title sheet, you should add a copy of the disclosure print showing the relevant minute(s) to the archive. Where the ROI is clear, there is no requirement to add a copy of the printout to the archive. Instead, ‘ROI clear’ should be added to the application notes. 

Personal Insolvency

Inhibition

The following paragraphs set out the procedure and effect of inhibitions executed on or after 22 April 2009. Registration officers should note that this section only relates to inhibitions in execution. Different rules may apply to other ROI entries which have inhibitory effect, e.g. a notice of determination of sequestration, as set out in the respective sections below. 

Effective date of an inhibition 

In terms of section 149 of the 2007 Act, an inhibition has effect from the beginning of the day on which it is registered.

However, when all of the following requirements are met:

  • a separate Notice of Inhibition is registered in the ROI (in the form prescribed);

  • the Schedule of Inhibition is served on the debtor after that notice is registered; and

  • the Schedule of Inhibition and Certificate of Execution are registered before 21 days have expired from the date of registration of the Notice,

the inhibition takes effect from the date of service of the Schedule on the debtor, which date will be entered on the Certificate of Execution and in the ROI entry.

This may lead to complications. For example, there may be two debtors cited and the Schedule of Inhibition might be served on party A on the Monday and party B on the Tuesday. In consequence the effective date of the inhibition may not be the same for both parties. Such instances should be referred to a senior officer.

Effect of breach of an inhibition

A deed delivered in breach of an inhibition may be reduced (made ineffective) by a court order obtained at the instance of the inhibiting creditor. The creditor’s right to reduce the deed remains in existence for 20 years from the date that the inhibition is breached. 

Whilst section 32 requires that an entry in the ROI be disclosed in a title sheet where the validity of a deed accepted for registration might be affected by an entry in the Register of Inhibitions, such an entry in a title sheet does not require to be accompanied by an exclusion or limitation of the Keeper's warranty to the applicant for registration. This is because the warranty is limited to the time of registration. For example, following registration of a disposition, under section 73(1)(a) the Keeper warrants to the applicant for registration (i.e the new registered proprietor) that the title sheet is accurate in so far as it shows an acquisition of the property in favour of the applicant. The benefits of warranty also extend to owners where the deed being registered triggers automatic plot registration and benefited proprietors where the deed relates to a title condition. As a deed in breach of an inhibition is not void (i.e. it is not wholly ineffective and invalid from the outset), no limitation of the Keeper's warranty is required. However, a title sheet would be inaccurate if a statement under section 32 was omitted in circumstances where the validity of the registrable deed might be affected by an entry in the Register of Inhibitions.

Frequently asked questions:

A person can be inhibited:

a) where their creditor has obtained a court decree in a Scottish court, either for payment of a debt or for specific implement of an obligation;

(b) where a document for debt in which they are the debtor has been registered for execution in the Books of Council & Session (i.e. without any court action);

(c) where a liability order is made against them in terms of section 38 of the Child Support Act 1991;

(d) where they have been interdicted from dealing with property by a restraint order in terms of section 32 of the Proceeds of Crime (Scotland) Act 1995 or section 123 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, the Courts may grant warrant for inhibition against any person interdicted by the order.

In general terms, an inhibition may affect any heritable property of the debtor. However, an exception is provided by section 153 of the 2007 Act which states that where an inhibition is executed to enforce a decree for specific implement of an obligation to (i) convey heritable property to a creditor or (ii) grant a real right in security to the creditor, the inhibition will then be limited to that property. In such circumstances the property will be specified in the Schedule of Inhibition. If the title is in the Land Register, the description will be by reference to the title number and if in the Register of Sasines by a description conforming to Schedule D or J to the Conveyancing (Scotland) Act 1924.

This can occur where a creditor has obtained a decree for payment of all or part of a principal sum in an action in which the creditor had executed inhibition on the dependence. An extract of the decree or a certified copy of the interlocutor can then be registered in the ROI along with a Notice of Decree immediately after the decree/interlocutor is issued. The change in status takes effect on the beginning of the date of registration of the Notice of Decree. The ROI entry will be:

[Notice of Decree [dated] following limited inhibition on the dependence under section 15J(b) of the Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987 by [inhibitor] against [inhibitee, designed] in relation to [property description] on [date] with relative [extract][interlocutor] thereon ]

If there is any doubt as to whether such an inhibition affects the subjects of a particular application in the Land Register, it must be referred to a senior officer.

Section 148(1) of the Bankruptcy and Diligence etc. (Scotland) Act 2007 (‘the 2007 Act’) provides for (a) a Schedule of Inhibition and (b) a Certificate of Execution of Inhibition (in forms prescribed by the Diligence (Scotland) Regulations 2009) to be registered together in the ROI. Registration results in a single entry in the ROI Minute Book, in the following style:

Schedule of Inhibition [inhibitor] against [inhibited, designed] served [date] per XY, Agent etc.

A notice of inhibition, as prescribed by section 155(4) of the Titles to Land Consolidation (Scotland) Act 1868 (added by section 149 of the 2007 Act) is entered on the ROI as follows:

Notice of Inhibition by [inhibitor, designed] against [inhibited, designed]. Dated

Schedule of Inhibition [inhibitor] against [inhibited, designed] in relation to [description of property being inhibited], per xxxx

Is a registrable deed in breach of, or subject to, an inhibition?

Specific guidance on the methods by which an inhibition is rendered extinct or terminated is set out below. In addition however, there are also several rules of law relevant to whether a particular registrable deed is rendered voidable by a breach of an inhibition.

The inhibition can only affect acts which occur after the inhibition comes into effect.

Where an individual is under a legally enforceable obligation to act at the time of the inhibition, carrying out that act will not breach the inhibition as it was not voluntary. A requisition would require the applicant to confirm that the registrable deed granted by the inhibited debtor was not a voluntary act.

An inhibition can affect only property already held by the debtor. Where an inhibition is registered in the ROI before the disposition in favour of the (now) registered proprietor/ inhibited debtor is registered in the Land Register, the inhibition does not affect the property. However, the law is complex as regards whether a debtor might acquire property, for the purposes of the effectiveness of an inhibition against them, on conclusion of a contract for acquisition of the property, or delivery of the title deed. A requisition would require to be raised to seek the applicant's confirmation whether the inhibition affected or did not affect.

Section 61(1) and (2) provide a "deed to which an advance notice relates, if registered on a date which falls within the protected period, is not subject to:

(1) an inhibition ... taking effect before that date but during that period; or

(2) anything registered or recorded in that register and taking effect, before that date but during that period, and having the effect of an inhibition registered against the granter."

See Check for advance notice above.

Section 159 of the 2007 Act provides that an inhibition ceases to affect a property of the debtor if the conveyance/granting of the right is for value and the person acquiring the property or right acts in good faith. A person is assumed to act in good faith if they have no knowledge of the inhibition and have taken all reasonable steps to find out whether or not such an inhibition exists. The purchaser will be considered to have acquired the property or a right in it on the date of delivery of the conveyancing deed.

This provides that an inhibited debtor breaches an inhibition when they deliver a deed to a third party transferring/granting a right in any property which is affected by the inhibition. Section 160 may interact with the common law rule that only a voluntary act of the debtor can be affected, and comes into effect where a concluded contract exists at the time of the effective date of the inhibition against the seller.

Where A concludes a contract (typically missives) to sell subjects or to grant or assign a lease to B and A is thereafter inhibited by C.

If missives have been concluded prior to the effective date of the inhibition, previous court cases have established that the inhibition does not bite at the disposition, grant or assignation of lease between A and B. A is generally considered to be under an obligation to sell or lease the property and the disposition, grant or assignation of lease to B is therefore not a voluntary act and not a breach of the inhibition.

However, given the terms of section 160 of the 2007 Act, it is for the applicant and their agent to reach a view on whether a particular inhibition affects the registrable deed in the circumstances.

There are two critical dates if the inhibition against the purchaser (granter of the security) is after the date of delivery (often the date of entry specified in the disposition but not necessarily). 

  • the date of delivery of the disposition; and

  • the date of settlement of the loan transaction underlying the standard security

The purchaser’s right under missives is the right to a conveyance delivered in exchange for the price. Until delivery the purchaser has no title. An inhibition does not affect property acquired after the date of registration of the inhibition, or any future dealings with such property acquired after the date of registration of the inhibition, for example the grant of a standard security. 

If an inhibition is registered against a purchaser on the same date as that on which his or her purchase is completed (date of settlement), the inhibition would strike at the validity of the standard security.

The facts of each application are not known to the registration officer and again, it is for the applicant to confirm whether a particular inhibition is adverse to the registrable deed.

The inhibition cannot affect a standard security if the date of settlement of the loan transaction pre-dates the inhibition. However, section 160 of the 2007 Act may affect whether a particular grant of standard security is potentially affected by an inhibition, and it is for the applicant to confirm whether a particular inhibition is adverse to the registrable deed.

Extinction and termination of inhibitions

Part 5 of the 2007 Act sets out a number of ways in which an inhibition may be wholly extinguished. 

An inhibition ceases to have effect after five years have expired from the date on which it became effective, unless it has been breached. If the inhibition has been breached, the right to reduce any deed which breached the inhibition remains for up to 20 years from the date that the inhibition is breached.   

In terms of section 157 of the 2007 Act, where an inhibition is executed to enforce payment of a debt and a sum is paid in respect of that debt plus interest, the inhibition expenses and the expenses of discharging the inhibition, the inhibition will cease to have effect. In these circumstances, the Keeper will not disclose the inhibition in a title sheet, provided that a discharge of the inhibition has been registered in the ROI.

If an application contains written confirmation that the provisions of section 157 apply to an apparently outstanding inhibition, but no discharge has been registered, the application should be referred to a senior caseworker.

Registers of Scotland (RoS) seeks to ensure that the information published in the 2012 Act Registration Manual is up to date and accurate but it may be amended from time to time.
The Manual is an internal document intended for RoS staff only. The information in the Manual does not constitute legal or professional advice and RoS cannot accept any liability for actions arising from its use.
Using this website requires you to accept cookies. More information on cookies.
Feedback