Quality Checklist - TP Plans

TP Plans - Section	Data Point Code	Data Point Name	Data Point Description		Links to Manual			Relevance / Consequences
Cadastral Map/ Supplementary Data Check	TQC1	Subjects	Have the correct subjects been mapped? Check the address in the application (deeds and forms) against the subjects shown on the cadastral map.	Description of Property Must Be Acceptable				To ensure correct subjects being registered. ROS - has an inaccurate register of subjects with the possibility of rectification costs and claims over the keepers warranty. Client - would have title to wrong subjects possible compensation claim.
Cadastral Map/ Supplementary Data Check	TQC2	Extent	Does the extent of the subjects on the cadastral map/supplementary data to the title sheet agree with the extent of the subjects in the deed(s), and does the extent agree with the extent removed from the parent title? Check that the extents of the tinted, edged or hatched areas shown on the deed plan(s) look the same as those shown on the cadastral map/supplementary data to the title sheet - i.e. are they the same shape/size? Any doubt then measure. If in the absence of a plan, a full bounding description should be provided which should reflect detail/ measurements on the cadastral map.	Description of Property Must Be Acceptable	Removal Styles on Parent Titles			To ensure legal title has been correctly registered. ROS - has an inaccurate register of the subjects with the possibility of rectification costs and claims over the keepers warranty. Client - has an inaccurate title possible compensation claim.
Cadastral Map/ Supplementary Data Check	TQC3	Competing title	Is the title free from competing titles? Or if your application is a Flat, is its location within the block unique? For tenement properties, are any verbally described exclusive or shared areas free from competition? Are the areas tinted, edged or hatched on the cadastral map/supplementary data to the title sheet unaffected by other registrations (other areas tinted, edged or hatched)? Note: Some areas will be shared and not necessarily competing, these should not be flagged up.	Checking for Competing Titles Within a Tenement Steading	possible competitions in title affecting any part of the property being registered			To ensure property being registered doesn't already belong to someone, in whole or in part. ROS - has an inaccurate register of subjects with the possibility of rectification costs and claims over the keepers warranty. Prior registered title becomes insecure. Client's title is liable to change and possible rectification claim.
Cadastral Map/ Supplementary Data Check	TQC4	References	Are all rights and burdens references clearly visible and correct on the cadastral map/supplementary data to the title sheet?
Cadastral Map/ Supplementary Data Check	TQC5	Mapping Data Quality	Are all references clearly visible, and appropriate, on the cadastral map/supplementary data to the title sheet and is the seed point positioned correctly? Has the title been authorised on DMS? For Plan Creator cases: Have the mapped polygons been correctly classified? Have any labels been correctly applied? Has any supplementary data been correctly created? Are there any geometry errors?	Mapping Styles & Plans References on the Cadastral Map	Print scale	Seed Points	/wiki/spaces/2ARM/pages/77070878	To ensure all references mapped are visible and appropriate To ensure no extra polygons or enlargements on the DMS and that all seed points stacked correctly ROS - has an inaccurate title with potential rectification costs. Client - receives a hard to read title with possible expense claims.
Cadastral Map/ Supplementary Data Check	TQC7	Tenement cadastral unit	If the subjects are a flatted property have the correct tenement steading cadastral unit procedures been followed/ has an appropriate tenement steading cadastral unit been used? Is there an existing tenement steading cadastral unit or should a new tenement steading cadastral unit be set up. Pertinents should be within the tenement steading cadastral unit or capable of being mapped on the cadastral map Use the Mapping Tenements properties guidance and flow charts to establish which process should be followed.	Mapping Tenement Properties	Tenement Scenarios			To ensure requirements are met to be able to establish a tenement steading extent and a unique flat description. ROS - has an inaccurate register of subjects with the possibility of rectification costs and claims over the keepers warranty. Client - receives inaccurate title. Possible compensation claim.
Property Section Checklist	AQC1	Real right	Has the Real Right field been completed correctly? Term entered should be OWNERSHIP when the Deed Inducing Registration (DIR) is a disposition or TENANCY when the DIR is a lease.	Add LRS Information Step 5.2.1				To narrate if the title is ownership or tenancy. ROS - holds an inaccurate register of subjects with the possibility of rectification costs and claims over the keepers warranty. Client - receives an inaccurate title, possible compensation claim.
Property Section Checklist	AQC2	Non-Tenement Description	Does the address and description of the subjects quoted in the Property section reflect the description in the application and that shown on the cadastral map/supplementary data to the title sheet? If the size of the subjects is equal to or over 0.5 hectare, has this been reflected in the property description?	Measurement of Area (Hectarage)				To ensure accurate addressing of the registered property. ROS - holds inaccurate title details with possible rectification costs. To ensure any subjects/ tenement steading cadastral unit over 0.5 ha has an area measurement narrated in title. To satisfy regulation 12(1)(f) of the Land Register Rules etc (Scotland) Regulations 2014. Title does not comply with 2014 Regulations ROS - Possible rectification cost. Client - Possible compensation claim
Property Section Checklist	AQC3	Tenement description	Does the address and description of the flatted subjects quoted in the Property section reflect the description in the application and that shown on the cadastral map/supplementary data to the title sheet? Does the description of the flat's location within the tenement (e.g. eastmost, first floor flat) reflect the description within the application and meet the essential criteria for descriptions of flats? If the size of the tenement steading cadastral unit is equal to or over 0.5 hectare, has this been reflected in the property description? Use the Mapping Tenements properties guidance and flow charts to establish which process should be followed.	Sample Property Section Styles - Tenement Properties	Description of Flatted Property Must Be Acceptable			To ensure accurate location or compass description of subjects within tenement is narrated. ROS - would register a title that is unidentifiable. Possible competing title. Possible inaccurate register with possibility of rectification costs and claims over the keepers warranty. Client - receives title to unidentifiable subjects. Possible compensation claim.
Property Section Checklist	AQC4	Title sheet references	Have all references shown on the cadastral map/supplementary data to the title sheet been referred to in the property description/application work desk? Are all references shown on the cadastral map/supplementary data to the title sheet referred to in the title sheet? Have all Sharing/Shared plot notes been added to LRS? Have all plans references in the title sheet been reflected on the cadastral map/supplementary data to the title sheet? Check that all plans references have been identified in the title sheet. If supplementary data to the title sheet has been assigned to the Title, is the supplementary data referred to in the title sheet?	Property Section Styles in the Title Sheet				To ensure all rights and burdens have been correctly narrated in the title. ROS - has an inaccurate register of subjects with the possibility of rectification costs and claims over the keepers warranty. Client - holds inaccurate title with possible compensation claim.